A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Notice

Message: Undefined index: languages

Filename: core/MY_Router.php

Line Number: 12

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/owlessays.com/blog/application/core/MY_Router.php
Line: 12
Function: _error_handler

File: /var/www/html/owlessays.com/blog/index.php
Line: 285
Function: require_once

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: array_search() expects parameter 2 to be array, null given

Filename: core/MY_Router.php

Line Number: 12

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/owlessays.com/blog/application/core/MY_Router.php
Line: 12
Function: array_search

File: /var/www/html/owlessays.com/blog/index.php
Line: 285
Function: require_once

need help with this paper Internal Environmental AnalysisStrategy Analysis and Strategy Selection 12point font word document 1016 pages analysis must be done on SOLAR CITY CORPORATION attached are assignment doc and rubic STEP 9 IS THE MOST IMPORTANT Rubric Name Assignment 2 Criteria Outstanding Superior Good Substandard Failure 28 points 238 points 21 points Background including 182 points vision mission and Background including 0 points objective are vision mission and Background including pre - Owl Essays | We Help You Navigate the Academic Jungle

Even complicated and confusing topics will be easily developed and covered if you request our help writing an essay. Place an order today!


need help with this paper:

Internal Environmental Analysis/Strategy Analysis and Strategy Selection


(12-point font word document, 10-16 pages)

analysis must be done on: SOLAR CITY CORPORATION

attached are: assignment doc and rubic

STEP #9 IS THE MOST IMPORTANT!!!!!!


Rubric Name: Assignment #2 Criteria Outstanding Superior Good Substandard Failure 2.8 points
2.38 points
2.1 points
Background including
1.82 points
vision, mission and
Background including
0 points
objective are
vision, mission and Background including
presented and
objective are
vision, mission and Attempted to
thoroughly discussed;
Content:
presented with good objective are
discuss
Failed to discuss
Background Vision, mission, and discussion; Good
presented with
background or
the background
including Vision, objectives are
discussion about
some discussion;
vision, mission and
Mission and thoroughly discussed vision, mission, and Vision, mission, and objectives but key and vision,
mission and
Objectives in terms of the
objectives are
objectives are
points were missing
objectives.
definition. For
discussed in terms of provided but not
or superficially
example, vision is
the definition but
discussed in any
presented.
(0 – 1.67)
forward thinking and
could be more
detail.
mission is about goals
thorough.
(1.68 - 1.95)
and values of
(1.96 - 2.23)
organization).
(2.24 - 2.51)
(2.52 - 2.8)
Content:
2.8 points
Internal
Environmental
Analysis
Internal
Environmental
Analysis including
corporate, business
and functional
analysis are 2.38 points 2.1 points 1.82 points 0 points Internal
Environmental
Analysis including
corporate, business
and functional
analysis are Internal
Environmental
Analysis including
corporate, business
and functional
analysis are Attempted to
Failed to
discuss Internal
present the
Environmental
Internal
Analysis including Environmental
corporate, business Analysis.
and functional Content:
Financial
Analysis analysis but key
presented with good presented with
presented and
points were missing
discussion; Good
some discussion;
thoroughly
or superficially
discussion about
stakeholders,
discussed. Thorough
presented.
stakeholders,
organizational
discussion of
Stakeholders,
organizational
structure,
stakeholders,
organizational
structure,
organizational culture,
organizational
structure,
organizational culture, and
structure,
organizational
and
communication/decisi
organizational culture,
culture, and
communication/decisi on making among
and
communication/deci
on making among
managers within
communication/decisi
sion making among (0 – 1.67)
managers within
human resources,
on making among
managers within
human resources,
marketing production,
managers within
human resources,
marketing production, operations, finance
human resources,
marketing
operations, finance and accounting, R&D,
marketing production,
production,
and accounting, R&D, and computer
operations, finance
operations, finance
and computer
information systems
and accounting, R&D,
and accounting,
information systems are provided but not
and computer
R&D, and computer
but could be more
discussed in any
information systems
information systems
thorough.
detail.
was not included.
(2.52 - 2.8)
(2.24 - 2.51)
(1.96 - 2.23)
(1.68 - 1.95)
2.8 points
2.38 points
2.1 points
1.82 points
0 points
Financial Analysis
thoroughly and
accurately presented
with calculated key
financial ratios,
industry averages
presented, Financial Analysis
Financial Analysis
Attempted
Failed to present
was accurately
was presented with to provide complete Financial
presented with
calculated key
financial analysis Analysis.
calculated key
financial ratios,
but ratios were
financial ratios shown,industry averages
taken from website (0 – 1.67)
industry averages
presented,
rather than showing
presented,
strength/weakness/ne calculations or Content:
Technique
Analysis calculations not
utral identified and
shown/Financial
strength/weakness/ne
company financials to analysis is
strength/weakness/ne utral identified and
the industry
superficial or fails to
utral identified and
company financials to
compared and
provide accurate
company financials to the industry
contrasted
information or there
the industry
compared and
but were not
was evidence of
compared and
contrasted but could
consistently accurate missing information
contrasted.
have been more
or thorough in
or only partial
thorough.
presentation.
presentation was
(2.52 - 2.8)
seen.
(2.24 - 2.51)
(1.96 - 2.23)
(1.68 - 1.95)
2.8 points
2.38 points
2.1 points
1.82 points
0 points
Technique Analysis: Technique Analysis: Technique Analysis: Attempted
Failed to present
accurate developmentaccurate developmentdevelopment of each to complete a
Technique Analy
of each technique
of each technique
technique with
technique analysis: sis.
with thoroughly
with
some explanation of there were several
explanation of IFE,
some explanation of IFE, BCG matrix,
issues related to the (0 – 1.67)
BCG matrix, Grand IFE, BCG matrix,
Grand Strategy Matrix development of
Strategy Matrix and Grand Strategy Matrix and QSPM;
each technique
QSPM; techniques
and QSPM;
techniques are briefly - IFE, BCG matrix,
are thoroughly
techniques are
discussed in terms of Grand Strategy
discussed in terms of discussed in terms of overall analysis but Matrix and QSPM;
overall analysis.
overall analysis.
there was missing
techniques were
information or
performed but no
analysis could have discussion in terms
(2.52 - 2.8)
(2.24 - 2.51)
been
of overall analysis
better presented.
or superficially (1.96 - 2.23)
2.1 points
2.8 points Content:
Strategy
Analysis presented.
(1.68 - 1.95)
1.82 points 2.38 points Attempted
Strategy Analysis
to complete a
accurately and
Strategy Analysis
Strategy Analysis
strategy analysis
thoroughly presented
accurately and
accurately and
but discussion
with discussion about
thoroughly presented thoroughly presented
about strengths and
strengths and
0 points
with discussion about with discussion about
weaknesses,
weaknesses, success
strengths and
strengths and
success factors,
factors, how
weaknesses, success weaknesses, success
how strategies can
strategies can
factors, how
factors, how
capitalize on major Failed to present
capitalize on major
strategies can
strategies can
strengths, improve Strategy Analysi
strengths, improve
capitalize on major
capitalize on major
upon weaknesses, s.
upon weaknesses, at
strengths, improve
strengths, improve
alternative
least three alternative
upon weaknesses, at upon weaknesses, at
strategies; cultural (0 – 1.67)
strategies; cultural
least five alternative least four alternative
factors and
factors and selections
strategies; cultural
strategies; cultural
prioritized
are prioritized. There
factors and selections factors and selections
selections is
are weak areas
are prioritized.
are prioritized.
missing information
presented throughout
or superficially
this section.
presented.
(2.52 - 2.8)
(2.24 - 2.51)
(1.96 - 2.23) (1.68 - 1.95)
1.82 points Content:
2.8 points
2.38 points
2.1 points
0 points
Recommendatio
n
Recommendation for Recommendation for Recommendation for Attempted to make Failed to provide
the best
the best
the best
recommendation for recommendation the best
strategy among
strategy among
strategy among
strategy among
alternatives strategies
alternatives
alternatives strategies alternatives strategies
is thoroughly
strategies but is
is briefly discussed. is discussed but the
discussed. The
superficially discuss for the best
The selected
selected strategy(ies)
selected strategy(ies)
ed. The selected strategy.
strategy(ies) aligns may not align with
aligns with all
strategy(ies)
with all elements of elements of the SM
elements of the SM
does not align with (0 – 1.67)
the SM process.
process.
process.
elements of the SM
process.
(2.24 - 2.51)
(1.96 - 2.23)
(2.52 - 2.8)
(1.68 - 1.95)
1.82 points
2.1 points
2.8 points
0 points
2.38 points
Comments reflect
Comments reflect a an unsatisfactory
Comments reflect a
Comments reflect
Comments reflect an satisfactory level of level of analysis,
highly accomplished
an unsatisfactory
excellent level of
analysis, synthesis, synthesis,
level of analysis,
level of analysis,
analysis, synthesis, evaluation and
evaluation and
synthesis, evaluation
synthesis,
Critical
evaluation and
reasoning of the case reasoning of the
and reasoning of the
evaluation and
Thinking/Reason
reasoning of the case material and case
case material and
case material and
reasoning of the
ing
material and case
study facts resulting case study facts,
case study facts
case material and
study facts resulting in partially correct
resulting in
resulting in accurate,
case study facts,
in accurately
conclusions that lack conclusions that are
thorough, and
resulting in failure
reasoned
development or detail underdeveloped or
soundly reasoned
to draw little to no
conclusions.
that demonstrates
lack soundly
conclusions.
conclusions.
insight into reasoning. reasoned
conclusions.
(2.24 - 2.51)
(2.52 - 2.8)
(0 – 1.67)
(1.96 - 2.23)
(1.68 - 1.95)
Application of 2.8 points
2.38 points
2.1 points
1.82 points
0 points Resources Attention to
Instructions Presents
Presents excellent
exceptionally wellarguments or
supported arguments positions that
or positions with
are mostly supported
evidence from the
by evidence from the
readings/experience; readings and course
ideas go beyond the content; ideas
course material and presented
recognize implicationsdemonstrate
and extensions of the understanding of the
material and
material and
concepts.
concepts. Satisfactory
arguments or
positions are
Arguments are
presented but there is frequently illogical Arguments lack
a mix of opinion or
and
meaningful
unclear view with
unsubstantiated;
explanation or
supported arguments Limited use of facts support of
using course
in case study and ideas. Does not
readings. Case study essential
provide facts
facts are occasionally information
presented in
used but arguments presented in course case study.
would be much
readings.
stronger with use of
(0 – 1.67)
facts.
(1.68 - 1.95) (2.52 - 2.8) (2.24 - 2.51) 1.4 points 1.19 points Demonstrates
exceptional
understanding of
requirements
responding
completely to each
aspect of assignment
including minor
aspects of the
assignment such as
using third person
writing, required use Demonstrates
Demonstrates
Fails to show a firm Fails to
excellent
satisfactory
understanding of
demonstrate
understanding of
understanding of
requirements;
understanding of
requirements; missed requirements; missed missed two key
assignment
one minor aspect of a key element or two elements or several requirements.
assignment.
minor aspects of
minor aspects of
assignment.
assignment.
(0 – 0.83)
(1.12 - 1.25)
(0.98 - 1.11)
(0.84 - 0.97) (1.96 - 2.23)
1.05 points 0.91 points 0 points of course readings,
and assignment
format.
(1.26 - 1.4)
2.8 points
2.38 points Writing
Mechanics 2.1 points 1.82 points Strictly adheres to
standard usage rules
of written English,
Minimally adheres
Excellently adheres to Satisfactorily adheres
including but not
to standard usage
standard usage of
to standard usage
limited to
rules of mechanics:
mechanics:
rules of mechanics:
capitalization,
conventions of
conventions of written conventions of
punctuation, run-on
written English,
English, including
English, including
sentences, missing or
including
capitalization,
capitalization,
extra words, stylistic
capitalization,
punctuation, and
punctuation, and
errors, spelling and
punctuation, and
spelling. One to three spelling. Four to 10
grammatical errors.
spelling. More than
errors found.
errors found.
No errors found. No
10 errors found.
contractions or jargon
(2.24 - 2.51)
(1.96 - 2.23)
used.
(1.68 - 1.95) (2.52 - 2.8)
APA Style (6th 1.4 points
ed.)
No APA style or
usage errors; Proper
citation of source
material is used
throughout paper; 1.19 points 1.05 points 0.91 points 0 points
Does not adhere
to standard
usage rules of
mechanics:
conventions of
written English
largely
incomprehensibl
e; or errors are
too plentiful to
count.
(0 – 1.67)
0 points Attempts in-text
Attempts in-text
Attempts in-text
No attempt at
citations and
citations and
citations and
APA style; or
reference list but one reference lists; APA reference lists; Fails attempts either
or two APA style
style errors are noted to use APA citation in-text citations
errors noted or fails to throughout document; when appropriate 4- or reference list 5 times; or presents
Reference titles follow
only 1-2 in-text
APA with only the first
Fails to use APA
citations and
use APA citations
word, the first word
citations when
reference list in a but omits the
when appropriate 1-2
after a colon and
appropriate 3 times in paper that requires other.
times.
proper nouns
document.
APA citations
capitalized.
throughout the
(0 – 0.83)
(1.12 - 1.25)
document.
(0.98 - 1.11)
(1.26 - 1.4)
(0.84 - 0.97)
Outstanding
Superior
Good
Substandard
Failure
Overall Score
25.2 or more
22.4 or more
19.6 or more
16.8 or more
0 or more

 


Solution details:
STATUS


ANSWER RATING

This question was answered on: Sep 05, 2019

Solution~000200074434.zip (25.37 KB)


This attachment is locked

We have a ready expert answer for this paper which you can use for in-depth understanding, research editing or paraphrasing. You can buy it or order for a fresh, original and plagiarism-free solution (Deadline assured. Flexible pricing. TurnItIn Report provided)

testimonials icon
Order Grade A+ Academic Papers Instantly!...
testimonials icon
 APA paper- 2 pages in length excluding cover page to include a minimum of one reference. Label e...
testimonials icon
Solutions Pro...
testimonials icon
all files on the zip files, the only source you can use1. List 3 benefits of getting enough rest and relaxation in your lif...
testimonials icon
Lois Campbell, a 57-year old woman has been overweight since childhood, has gained weight throughout her adult life, and has tried many diets wit...
testimonials icon
Choose one (1) of the topics below and develop a three to four (3-4) paragraph essay (of at least 250-500 words) w...
testimonials icon
In this assignment, you will conduct a SWOT (Strength, Weakness, Opportunity, and Threat) analysis for the type of beverage you have selected, and...
testimonials icon
Nuclear medicine is a specialized branch of modern medicine that exploits the process of radioactivity for imaging, diagnosis, and treatme...
testimonials icon
Diversity discussion board unit 4  In your own words, answer this unit’s discussion questions in a main p...
testimonials icon
The purpose of the Final Paper is for you to culminate the learning achieved in the course by describing your understanding and application of know...

Other samples, services and questions:

Calculate Price

When you use PaperHelp, you save one valuable — TIME

You can spend it for more important things than paper writing.

Approx. price
$65
Order a paper. Study better. Sleep tight. Calculate Price!
Created with Sketch.
Calculate Price
Approx. price
$65